A mother in Idaho is being investigated for injury to a child after eight witnesses signed statements that she caused injury to a child.
“They described it as she was slamming her on the ground and smothering her as she was holding her.
The officer who issued the citation reported no visible signs of injury to the child, he added.”
One of these statements is false. How is it possible to “slam” a two year old on the ground without that child sustaining injuries? A bruise, scrape or cut would be visible if that was true. The officer could not see any physical injuries, but still cited the mother. I also want to know how that is possible.
Why was the mother restraining her child, you ask? The mother did not want her child to run out into the street while the parade was continuing. I guess these people would have preferred to see that little girl get really hurt or possibly killed instead of her mother restraining her. Then the same people could complain that the mother could not control her unruly child.
The parents are concerned that their children will be taken away from them. Let’s hope for all their sakes that does not happen.
Powered by ScribeFire.