http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/the-wrong-set-of-beliefs/ An eclectic blog from an eclectic author. Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:55:20 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/the-wrong-set-of-beliefs/#comment-452 Principled Discovery » Carnival of Principled Government, A few questions. Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:09:14 +0000 http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-452 [...] That annoying Constitution. What do we need it for anyway?  Maybe to limit the state’s power in the raising of children? [...] [...] That annoying Constitution. What do we need it for anyway?  Maybe to limit the state’s power in the raising of children? [...]

]]> http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/the-wrong-set-of-beliefs/#comment-413 The Wrong Set of Beliefs Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:31:40 +0000 http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-413 [...] <a href="http://yankeecowgirl.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/the-wrong-set-of-beliefs/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Abrianna</strong></a> wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptNate Tseglin was forcibly taken form his home because the state disagreed with the way the parents were treating him. “The teacher reported seeing self-inflicted scratches on Nate’s body and complained about the doctor-approved arm restraints his parents used to keep Nate from hurting himself.” The teacher did not like the scratches, nor did she like the doctor approved restraints. It appears that these parents could not have pleased this teacher no matter what they did. Adding more insult to injury: “…even though the court determined “the evidence is clear that the parents have always stood by and tried to help their son,” the court sided with the government.” The court did not say the Tseglins were abusive. The court did not say the Tseglins were neglecting their son, but that didn’t matter. They still took Nate from his parents, and do not allow them to be involved in decisions regarding his […] [...] [...] Abrianna wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptNate Tseglin was forcibly taken form his home because the state disagreed with the way the parents were treating him. “The teacher reported seeing self-inflicted scratches on Nate’s body and complained about the doctor-approved arm restraints his parents used to keep Nate from hurting himself.” The teacher did not like the scratches, nor did she like the doctor approved restraints. It appears that these parents could not have pleased this teacher no matter what they did. Adding more insult to injury: “…even though the court determined “the evidence is clear that the parents have always stood by and tried to help their son,” the court sided with the government.” The court did not say the Tseglins were abusive. The court did not say the Tseglins were neglecting their son, but that didn’t matter. They still took Nate from his parents, and do not allow them to be involved in decisions regarding his […] [...]

]]>